Reading

The assigned readings are the core of the course material, and students are expected to carefully and critically read each assignment before class. To facilitate students’ engagement with the reading and to help prevent students from falling behind, we will use the online tool Perusall for all required readings. Perusall is a reading platform in which students annotate texts collaboratively alongside one another. More information on how Perusall works and how it is integrated into the course is available here.

Readings will be graded as either complete (1 point) or incomplete (0 points). Student responses must demonstrate a thoughtful and thorough reading of the entire assignment to receive credit. At the end of the semester, the four lowest reading grades will be dropped from the assessment. Reading assessments will contribute 10% to the final grade for the course.

Lectures

The scheduled class periods will held simultaneously in the classroom and remotely on Microsoft Teams. Typically, the first 15–30 minutes of the class will consist of a live-streamed lecture during which students (including those attending remotely) are encouraged to engage in class-wide discussion.

The slides will be made available before class, and a recording of the lecture with a transcript will be available later the same day.

Group discussions

The large portion of class time will be devoted to small-group discussions and collaborative composition of discussion responses. After the second full week of classes, students will form groups of approximately four or five. Groups will work together to provide responses to provided worksheets of discussion questions. There will be a total of 9 worksheets over the course of the semester, each spanning the content from multiple class periods. Exact due dates are available on the [schedule] below.

The worksheets will be evaluated according to the following rubric:

10 points

Responses demonstrate a nuanced engagement with the reading and link ideas from the text to themes, theories, and other topics from class.

8–9.5 points

Responses demonstrate a basic engagement with the reading but may miss important implications or connections.

5–7.5 points

Responses demonstrate a superficial understanding/engagement of the reading or contain numerous fundamental misunderstandings of the concepts.

0–4.5 points

Responses are cursory, or not submitted at all.

Marks for worksheet responses will be given to all members of the group. At the end of the semester, groups will perform peer evaluation (submitting evaluations is worth 2.5% of your total grade) that will adjust each participant’s discussion grade up or down by as much as 10%. Group discussions will contribute 30% to the final grade for the course**.

Discussion prompts

Each student is responsible for submitting three discussion prompts relating to the readings over the semester. By the end of the second full week of class, random assignments will be sent to each student. If your assigned reading creates a conflict for you, please contact the professor as soon as possible to resolve the scheduling.

Discussion prompts will be evaluated on a ten-point scale based on the engagement and originality of the question. High-scoring submissions will engage with more than just basic concepts and will elicit responses that go beyond what is written in the text itself. For instance, the prompt might ask for a critical engagement with a point made by the author, suggesting a different interpretation of the reading; or the prompt might contrast a point made in the text to another reading or topic discussed in the class. Students should try to craft questions that will help others to think outside the reading.

Throughout the semester, the instructor will choose some submitted questions to be included on the discussion worksheets described above. Students whose questions are used in this way will receive an automatic mark of 10/10 (100%) on their submission.

Discussion questions will contribute 20% to the final grade for the course.

Poster presentation

At the end of the semester, students will participate in a peer-evaluated poster session. Each student will produce a poster presenting a piece of scientific research or technological output to an outside perspective. Further details will be provided at a later date.

In total, the final project will be worth 37.5% of each student’s grade, broken down as follows: 5% for topic submission and group peer review (due Mon, Oct 4); 30% for the poster (due Fri, Dec 3); and 2.5% for peer evaluation of others’ posters (due Fri, Dec 10).

Accessibility

Students who need accommodation or who are having trouble accessing any aspect of the course may contact me directly. I will make every effort to accommodate individual circumstances—including religious, medical, or other personal circumstances.

Students with disabilities in need of formal accommodation are encouraged to contact the Office for Students with Disabilities (http://www.mcgill.ca/osd/, phone 514-398-6009).

Les étudiants qui ont besoin d’un accommodation ou qui ont des difficultés à accéder à un aspect du cours peuvent me contacter directement. Je ferai tout mon possible pour tenir compte des circonstances individuelles, y compris des circonstances religieuses, médicales ou autres.

Les étudiants handicapés ayant besoin d’un accommodation formel sont encouragés à contacter le Bureau des étudiants en situation de handicap (http://www.mcgill.ca/osd/fr, téléphone 514-398-6009).

Academic integrity

McGill University values academic integrity. Therefore, all students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Code of Student Conduct and Disciplinary Procedures (see http://www.mcgill.ca/students/srr/honest/ for more information).(approved by Senate on 29 January 2003)

L’université McGill attache une haute importance à l’honnêteté académique. Il incombe par conséquent à tous les étudiants de comprendre ce que l’on entend par tricherie, plagiat et autres infractions académiques, ainsi que les conséquences que peuvent avoir de telles actions, selon le Code de conduite de l’étudiant et des procédures disciplinaires (pour de plus amples renseignements, veuillez consulter le site http://www.mcgill.ca/students/srr/honest/).

Lanugage of evaluation

In accord with McGill University’s Charter of Students’ Rights, students in this course have the right to submit in English or in French any written work that is to be graded. (approved by Senate on 21 January 2009)

Conformément à la Charte des droits de l’étudiant de l’Université McGill, chaque étudiant a le droit de soumettre en français ou en anglais tout travail écrit devant être noté (sauf dans le cas des cours dont l’un des objets est la maîtrise d’une langue).

Grade appeals

Instructors and teaching assistants take the marking of assignments very seriously, and we work diligently to be fair, consistent, and accurate. Nonetheless, mistakes and oversights occasionally happen. If you believe that to be the case, you must adhere to the following rules:

• If it is a mathematical error simply alert the instructor of the error.
• In the case of more substantive appeals, you must:
  1. Wait at least 24 hours after receiving your mark.
  2. Carefully re-read your assignment, all guidelines and marking schemes, and the grader’s comments.
  3. If you wish to appeal, you must submit to the instructor a written explanation of why you think your mark should be altered. Please note that upon re-grade your mark may go down, stay the same, or go up.