SOCI 325: Sociology of Science

Agenda

Social construction & the real

  1. Administrative
  2. Social construction
  3. Epistemology in STS
  4. Next three readings
Page 1 of 20

ie if i tell you “we all know that the earth revolves around the sun” or: “vaccines decrease the chances of catching COVID” how can we call that ‘correct’? does the earth really revolve around the sun? How could I justify that belief?

Pretty much all STS scholars subscribe to constructivism, but not all subscribe to realism Going to go over each of these in a bit more detail

standard view: we observe reality and describe it bring up bias as an inherently realist term

constructing objects: lab rats, subatomic particles (Higgs boson), astronomical images science shaping social: chromasomal/hormone definitions of gender, cutoffs for healthy/unhealty levels on medical tests, phsychological diagnoses, healthy/unhealthy levels of exposure to toxins (expertise!)

Phenomena (in philosopyy): things that humans experience through senses. Empiricism doesn't necessarily refute the existence of a 'true' reality, it just refutes the relevance of a 'true' reality.

Late 16th century early 17th century: Galileo Galilei argues for Copernican model by pitting it against Ptolemy’s geocentric model Today we believe: both are wrong

strong programme and standpoint theory fit nicely into nominalism